Abstract: Propensity Score Matching in a Meta-Analysis Comparing Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Propensity Score Matching in a Meta-Analysis Comparing Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies Felix J. Thoemmes a , Stephen G. West b & Eric Hill b a Texas A&M University b Arizona State University Published online: 11 Dec 2009. To cite this article: Felix J. Thoemmes , Stephen G. West & Eric Hill (2009) Abstract: Propensity Score Matching in a Meta-Analysis Comparing Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44:6, 854-854, DOI: 10.1080/00273170903467521 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273170903467521 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions D ow nl oa de d by [ C or ne ll U ni ve rs ity L ib ra ry ] at 1 1: 26 2 3 Fe br ua ry 2 01 5 Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44:854, 2009 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0027-3171 print/1532-7906 online DOI: 10.1080/00273170903467521 Abstract: Propensity Score Matching in a Meta-Analysis Comparing Randomized Propensity Score Matching in a Meta-Analysis Comparing Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies
منابع مشابه
A Review of Propensity Score Application in Healthcare Outcome and Epidemiology
ABSTRACT Propensity score approaches in outcomes and epidemiological research are most often used for sample selection by matching, analysis of causal effect by stratification, or risk adjustment by combining propensity score and regression models. Several computing tools are available including SAS, S-PLUS/R, and SPSS to develop and implement propensity score approaches in a variety of applica...
متن کاملEffect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach.
BACKGROUND Although the potential survival benefit of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting in comparison with single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting has been emphasized by many investigators, the use of BIMA is still low in clinical practice in the absence of randomized trials and long-term results. In the current study, we aimed to assess if there is a long-term survival b...
متن کاملVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy or open lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer? Minimizing selection bias in observational studies.
We have read with interest the paper by Hanna et al. [1], comparing oncological outcomes between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and open lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using propensity score matching, to minimize selection bias in the retrospective cohort in their hospital. To date, more and more surgeons have performed VATS lobectomy for early NSCLC and...
متن کاملPercutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease with or without intravascular ultrasound: A meta-analysis
This meta-analysis compared IVUS-guided with angiography-guided PCI to determine the effect of IVUS on the mortality in patients with LM CAD. Current guidelines recommend intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LM CAD; Class IIa, level of evidence B). A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochr...
متن کاملPropensity Score Methods for Causal Inference with the PSMATCH Procedure
In a randomized study, subjects are randomly assigned to either a treated group or a control group. Random assignment ensures that the distribution of the covariates is the same in both groups and that the treatment effect can be estimated by directly comparing the outcomes for the subjects in the two groups. In contrast, subjects in an observational study are not randomly assigned. In order to...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Multivariate behavioral research
دوره 44 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009